3 ms·

The absurdity of anarchism is thus shown. It always ultimately ends up re-inventing government.

• vegenaise 1mo ago
  anarchism is no rulers, not no rules. "it always ends up..." please, i would love to hear all these examples you have. burning man isn't anarchism, btw. anarchism rejects all hierarchies, is typically horizontally organized, often ran by consensus though decision making varies by flavor, is inherently anticapitalist. there would be no profit and remuneration would be even across the board. you can see how burning man could never be called anarchist. but some examples for your consideration, ezln doesn't claim it but the way they organize themselves it's largely the same, rojava, cnt-fai/revolutionary spain.
  • Ancapistani 1mo ago
    > anarchism […] is inherently anticapitalist No, it’s not. I get that your flavor may be, and that’s fine, but your definition is neither the only one or the first.
    • megagpt2 1mo ago
      [dead]