2 ms·
> These technicalities are being exploited for the benefit of approximately 10 people Legislative compromises aren’t “technicalities.” The exceptions are as mu
by rayiner 2mo ago
> These technicalities are being exploited for the benefit of approximately 10 people
Legislative compromises aren’t “technicalities.” The exceptions are as much a part of the laws as any other part. If they didn’t exist the laws wouldn’t have passed in the first place.
> Your talking points are old and exhausted
Your talking points—treating law as just an expression of intent rather than a reticulated framework—are third world mentality.
- soco 1mo agoHuh??? The intent of the law is what the entire system and in the entire world is working nowadays, I mean in the real world - aka outside of the minds of the technocultists. This is exactly what the courts are doing everywhere, upholding the intent of the law, and also why legal AI is continuously failing at it - it can't figure out the intent among all edge cases and yeah technicalities.
- rayiner 1mo ago> The intent of the law is what the entire system and in the entire world is working nowadays No, in first world countries we follow the letter of the law, including exceptions.
- soco 1mo agoI don't know why you must underline all that "first world" thing, it doesn't make your argument stronger. Please actually verify it, instead of blindly repeating slogans. Namely the courts may start with the letter, find subsequently the letter doesn't apply 100% because things and humans, then proceed to apply the spirit of the law the way they interpret it.