3 ms·
Pure vibe-coding isn’t that satisfying (as you’ve discovered) the problem is you’re constantly reviewing its huge output, and it probably goes wild in direction
by gitgud 1mo ago
Pure vibe-coding isn’t that satisfying (as you’ve discovered) the problem is you’re constantly reviewing its huge output, and it probably goes wild in directions making assumptions.
It’s much more fulfilling to give the LLM guardrails by engineering the solution.
This means coming up with the high level architecture, dependencies, breaking down the system into deliverable chunks, and implementing those chunks. The LLM can help in all those steps of the process. And it will be much easier to review and keep an understanding of the code.
- LelouBil 1mo agoPersonally, I only have success with coding agents if it's for filling in some design I already engineered and half-implemented (like added interfaces and method declarations for example) I feel like this is the best way to condition the agent, I don't have much success trying to do it via the prompt only