3 ms·
That bsky post is mirroring the x.com/ClaudeDevs account. The mirror is missing the next post: "Compared to today, this works out to a 17% reduction in weekly
by big_toast 1mo ago
That bsky post is mirroring the x.com/ClaudeDevs account.
The mirror is missing the next post: "Compared to today, this works out to a 17% reduction in weekly limits on Claude Code"
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- dgellow 1mo agoI’m confused, how does that work?
- cassianoleal 1mo agoIIUC it's been on a "temporary" raise, which is higher than the one they're now "making permanent".
- caxco93 1mo agomaybe he means in respect to how many reach the limit?
- zefalt 1mo agoApparently they were already offering 50% extra limits. 150% -> 125% 25÷150 = .1667 That's how they arrived at 17%. https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2093742321473065266 https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2093742321473065266
- dgellow 1mo agoThanks
- big_toast 1mo agoI wanted to say something dismissive. It feels like a lot of doublespeak, which I think undermines trust in them. But I do understand that it's a little hard to characterize the amount of compute they're selling while obfuscating the business model enough that it still works. Demand, costs, supply, capabilities, competition change wildly week to week. Selling a standardized "token" via the API with gas-like pricing works a lot better for transparency. But I think there's a world where the ambiguous subscription pricing is net beneficial for users and providers. Allowing some degree of price discrimination should benefit everyone in aggregate, assuming there's real competition and not yet another duopoly..
- someone4958923 1mo agoYeah, sadly xcancel.com is down.