12 ms·
No. Nada. Wrong. With compilers, you still had to think in depth about the code, write it, develop and maintain muscle memory, understand what you were doing
by b112 1mo ago
No. Nada. Wrong.
With compilers, you still had to think in depth about the code, write it, develop and maintain muscle memory, understand what you were doing.
Many are not doing any of that, and coding is a skill you need to constantly practice.
- lrvick 1mo ago> Many are not doing any of that I do. Most people sucked at programming before AI and they still suck after it. Who cares what "many" do. We as individuals can demand higher bars from ourselves and our teams. AI can increase that bar or lower it depending on how it is used.
- b112 1mo agoAnd yet, you're in a thread discussing the people who don't look at llm output. And where you tried to claim that assembly -> compiled language, is the same abstraction as coding -> not even looking at LLM output. And then after I replied, edited your comment to change that context a bit. So as for ypur original assertion, in this subthread, no... not even remotely the same.