3 ms·
On a similar note, is there any distro that explicitly has banned usage of generative AI for their project? Asking for a friend.
by sph 1mo ago
On a similar note, is there any distro that explicitly has banned usage of generative AI for their project? Asking for a friend.
- phyzix5761 1mo agoThe problem is you can't prove if AI was used or not so Debian's response is actually the most logical one. If anyone uses AI they're still responsible for what they submit.
- doublerabbit 1mo agoWhat happens when the AI submitted code has been submitted by AI, Who's then responsible?
- tredre3 1mo agoWhoever controls the AI, as per the article we're discussing. Debian isn't a free-for-all, they don't accept fly-by-night contributions, there needs to be a real and serious person behind every contribution.
- doublerabbit 1mo agoFolk get's lazy, it'll will only be a matter of time. Ai controlling Ai, deep fakes are deep fakes.
- account42 1mo agoNot being able to always prove that something wasn't done isn't a good argument no to make it clear that doing something you find unacceptable is in fact not acceptable.
- GalaxyNova 1mo agoGentoo, Guix, a few others
- tinkelenberg 1mo agoOpenBSD seems to have this stance. Source: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2
- sph 1mo agoMight be time for me to give it a serious go
- TiredOfLife 1mo agoI will take a guess and say every systemd-less one