2 ms·

https://www.harness-bench.ai/leaderboard.html https://www.harness-bench.ai/leaderboard.html This provides a method, but the data looks stale and perhaps a bit

• alainchabat 1mo ago
  never heard of nanobot. how reliable is this benchmark?
  • reilly3000 1mo ago
    I can’t speak to the veracity of the benchmarks but it appears their methodology is sound. Nanobot has 47k stars, fwiw https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot It has been more of an OpenClaw or Hermes alternative than a coding agent like OpenCode or Pi, so it’s likely to do well given less context bloat.
  • cheeze 1mo ago
    IMO it's not. It's benchmarking GPT 5.4 and Opus 4.6. It's also missing Claude Code... one of the most popular harnesses (the most?)
    • hirako2000 1mo ago
      No Pi, no Aider either.