> there were numerous comments saying variations on this theme: "well, yes, but how about novel stuff, how about new things, original work, yadda yadda" This c

> there were numerous comments saying variations on this theme: "well, yes, but how about novel stuff, how about new things, original work, yadda yadda" This completely misconstrues what professional mathematicians were claiming. The argument would be better phrased as: "having a vast accessible memory and the ability to very rapidly test/recombine previously-elucidated approaches means that AIs can and will easily outdo much of the mathematical community." Now, one could plausibly make the argument that this is functionally equivalent to a certain form of creativity (I would). But, it may just as well also be a non-exhaustive form. And that is where the open question resides.