2 ms·

You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.

• frumplestlatz 1mo ago
  Controversial -- particularly amongst those of a particular political persuasion that supports a terrorist state -- doesn’t mean preposterous.
  • inigyou 1mo ago
    We get it - everyone you disagree with is a terrorist. You can stop commenting now.
    • frumplestlatz 1mo ago
      That's a deeply flawed reading of what I've written. For example, you've disagreed with me in a way that leads me to believe you're more than a little bit dense, but not a terrorist.
  • asib 1mo ago
    It doesn't mean preposterous or not preposterous. It does mean there is general dispute regarding the proscription. Appealing to it is not really progressing your argument. Both decisions are controversial, you don't make a more convincing argument as to why one controversial decision should not be considered controversial, by pointing to a different, also controversial, decision.