3 ms·
That is a preposterous claim, but maybe you're being sincere. If so, can you provide an example?
by luma 1mo ago
That is a preposterous claim, but maybe you're being sincere. If so, can you provide an example?
- frumplestlatz 1mo ago[flagged]
- asib 1mo agoYou're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.
- frumplestlatz 1mo agoControversial -- particularly amongst those of a particular political persuasion that supports a terrorist state -- doesn’t mean preposterous.
- inigyou 1mo agoWe get it - everyone you disagree with is a terrorist. You can stop commenting now.
- frumplestlatz 1mo agoThat's a deeply flawed reading of what I've written. For example, you've disagreed with me in a way that leads me to believe you're more than a little bit dense, but not a terrorist.
- asib 1mo agoIt doesn't mean preposterous or not preposterous. It does mean there is general dispute regarding the proscription. Appealing to it is not really progressing your argument. Both decisions are controversial, you don't make a more convincing argument as to why one controversial decision should not be considered controversial, by pointing to a different, also controversial, decision.