It could be a new keyword rather than counting on the compiler to prove certain access patterns don't exist. That's a bit of a messy tradeoff. Maybe something l

It could be a new keyword rather than counting on the compiler to prove certain access patterns don't exist. That's a bit of a messy tradeoff. Maybe something like 'unordered struct' or 'packed struct' works, but it would be a nonstandard extension for some time.