3 ms·
I'd say that only really strengthens OP's overall point of being about using "the wrong language for the wrong thing".
by fluffybucktsnek 1mo ago
I'd say that only really strengthens OP's overall point of being about using "the wrong language for the wrong thing".
- throw0101a 1mo agoYes: JSON was meant to be a machine-to-machine format, and it's the humans that are insisting on comments.
- krapp 1mo agoJSON was also meant to be read and edited by people, as was all web technology, and people have a use for comments. Even Douglas Crockford suggested that people could still use comments, as long as they strip them out before parsing.