> the inherent intelligence of the model making its language more intricate and difficult for humans to easily parse? Humans who are actually well above averag

> the inherent intelligence of the model making its language more intricate and difficult for humans to easily parse? Humans who are actually well above average intelligence don't write like that simply to signal intelligence (although sometimes they're constrained by style expectations of their communication channels). So I hesitate to accept it as a sign of increasing model "intelligence", either.