3 ms·
There's a bunch of quite good speculation like this in Plan A https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-
by frabcus 1mo ago
There's a bunch of quite good speculation like this in Plan A
https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a
And yes, moved into skyscrapers:
"This implies that the price of housing will become dominated by the price of the land (as opposed to the cost of building housing), so dense housing (e.g. skyscrapers) will become relatively much cheaper than sparse housing"
There's a later bit that talks about keeping earth as a reserve too.
- augment_me 1mo agoI want to see the political climate and situation that lead up to a decision like this. Like, if you just go off basic human desires, politics, the amount of money invested in outcome D, and how previous global events are handled. Humans are reactive and not proactive, similar concept can be seen with climate change, terrorist attacks, financial crashes, etc, shit has to get really bad before a decision to change is made. From the site, I think the most realistic outcome is Plan D and then eventually Plan C when people start freaking out. I dont see any path where you get even close to Plan A. So either lay out how Plan A is supposed to happen in the population, or revise the answer.