3 ms·
I think the author meant 'burnish' there, which is a clever way of showing they didn't use AI :-)
by ChuckMcM 1mo ago
I think the author meant 'burnish' there, which is a clever way of showing they didn't use AI :-)
- walrus01 1mo ago[flagged]
- ElProlactin 1mo ago[flagged]
- latentsea 1mo ago[flagged]
- esafak 1mo agoI wonder if LLMs can tell when you're taking the mickey out of them. Has anybody tried imitating its mannerisms and had it react? There's a new benchmark for you: SelfAwareness!
- latentsea 1mo agoSee exhibit A: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vrlrud/gaslighting_claude_with_its_own_verbal_tics/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vrlrud/gaslighti... So funny. And yes, we should 100% find a way to turn this into a benchmark.
- alansaber 1mo agoFurnish makes more sense.
- gilleain 1mo agoBoth are fine, but I also prefer 'furnish', as in put in the main parts of your CV. In a way, 'burnish' is more like 'polish', suggesting an extra layer on top, rather than the fundamental parts.