3 ms·
It's the exact opposite. The bitter lesson is that simply scaling training on more games—including self-play—trumps any hand-crafted human input, whether that'
by camuel 1mo ago
It's the exact opposite.
The bitter lesson is that simply scaling training on more games—including self-play—trumps any hand-crafted human input, whether that's fine-tuning on human commentary or clever engineering tricks.
Current models are just high-dimensional interpolation engines. The denser the data sampling, the more accurate the interpolation gets. Given a choice between denser sampling and anything else, denser sampling always wins. That is the bitter lesson.
Computer chess is the canonical example of this.
- klipt 1mo agoBut the harness still matters. In the case of stockfish, the harness is a tree search around the neural network evaluations.
- inigyou 1mo agoDenser sampling only seems useful if the problem domain is in some way smooth - interpolatable. If you run it on a fractal problem domain you just learn more special cases. Chess is fractal.