3 ms·
Obvious question: why wasn’t this done earlier? It looks like all the data was already available. At THAT scale, reducing memory usage is a must-have, not a nic
by cristaloleg 1mo ago
Obvious question: why wasn’t this done earlier? It looks like all the data was already available. At THAT scale, reducing memory usage is a must-have, not a nice-to-have. Weird.
- yieldcrv 1mo agoprobably agents going through tech debt or finding wins every dept knows what they could do with more budget, the budget for those things just never comes now agents have utilized budget more effeftively, unbottlenecking many things, including engineering blogs
- sophacles 1mo agoCloudflare talks about having datacenters in 300+ cities. Presumably they have at least a few servers per datacenter. They saved 130 servers worth of memory... not even the minimum number of servers they have (seriously though, they probably have a LOT of servers)... a few GBs of memory per server running the service. At that scale this is a nice-to-have.