4 ms·
> anybody who thinks this is a "lot" of money for fashion photo...a common camera for doing fashion photography costs $35,000+ the money spent on hi-end fashio
by zalew 14y ago
> anybody who thinks this is a "lot" of money for fashion photo...a common camera for doing fashion photography costs $35,000+
the money spent on hi-end fashion shoots isn't in cameras. leased/bought equipment works for itself hundreds of times, and when you do the math for cost per shoot, the camera would probably be one of the cheapest items on the expense list after coffee.
> No, this isn't for porn, it's probably for fashion photography.
ummm, more like packshots.
- shiftpgdn 14y agoWhy would you need a bullet time setup for packshots? The only scenario I could possibly think of would be if you were selling animals.
- zalew 14y agothe only kind of studio photography that comes to my mind where you don't work with your legs, keep camera in a constant position and don't want any drop shadows is packshots. the setup is basically a huge light box with more cameras. probably for some crazy demos. I can't imagine why somebody would shoot people with 50 cameras constantly leveled up on the same height. maybe for one experimental project, but what next.
- wtracy 14y agoMaybe they want something shot with the product falling in midair, or a model with a fan blowing his/her hair and clothing? Or it could be some appliance/machine that they want to capture in action (a popcorn popper would be a mundane example). Heck, maybe they just want to shoot a product sitting in the middle of a cloud from a fog machine.