3 ms·
Maybe - but I would argue that the skill comes in knowing if the architecture is appropriate and knowing that LLM is not screwing it up.
by iamflimflam1 1mo ago
Maybe - but I would argue that the skill comes in knowing if the architecture is appropriate and knowing that LLM is not screwing it up.
- a2ff6eeb0 1mo agoYou can get more confidence by asking the LLM about when the architecture would be appropriate than by trying to intuit it yourself. The LLM is trained on so many more architectures and stories of how they panned out than you are. The skill is really in manually testing before handoff.
- queenkjuul 1mo agoI still get occasional hallucinations, wrong answers, and entirely unnecessary change proposals from LLMs. An LLM being confident in its own work does not make me confident in it.
- a2ff6eeb0 1mo agoYou get that from humans too.
- queenkjuul 1mo agoNo shit, that's why we review code... You're not making a point
- a2ff6eeb0 1mo agoAnd LLMs are already better code reviewers than humans are; take a look at the bugs found in the Linux kernel.