3 ms·

But why do I have be prohibited from it just because you have an unintelligible feeling it's bad somehow?

by bcjdjsndon 1mo ago

0x70run 1mo ago
[dead]
forshaper 1mo ago
OP specifies that they would prefer opt-in to either side.
happymellon 1mo ago
They didn't say you would be. Just label it, so those that want it can seek it out. Having a music charts that doesn't include AI generated music does not stop AI generated music.
copemaxxxing 1mo ago
Did I say this somewhere?
D-Machine 1mo ago
No one is banning or prohibiting AI generated music from being listened to hear, just they are saying that to be considered on a very specific chart, there need to be limits on the amount of AI used. Very weak overall, especially given the irrelevance of these kinds of charts today.
nunez 1mo ago
Because the only way the economics of the underlying technology remain sustainable is that this stuff is everywhere anywhere all the time, regardless of underlying ethics or how many livelihoods it claims as it spreads. Because the chief business model of this industry is so obviously the "drug dealer" strategy: give 'em their first hits for free and their next few hits for cheap so that they won't even blink while giving the company $200/month to basically rent their own brain back. (lol Imagine JetBrains in 2019 rolled out a super souped-up IDE for $200/month. They'd go bankrupt from the embarrassment alone. Shoot, imagine Hacker News users in 2019 talking about how they pay $200/month to do their own job. SO MANY PEOPLE would cry "MLM!!!!!") Because there's a generation of new people growing up in a world that's progressively training them to forfeit their own capabilities to the industry that will sell their skills back to them, and every AI blog post or song that gets the limelight without protest is tacitly green-lighting this outcome. (This is clearly happening given that Hollywood is trying to make AI actors a thing and some label cut a $3M record deal to an AI musician that's "naturally" charting on Billboard: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/09/27/al-singer-xania-monet-just-charted-on-billboard-signed-3m-deal-is-this-the-future-of-music/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/09/27/al-sing...)
pibaker 1mo ago
The charts in question are compiled by the Australian Recording Industry Association. It makes economical sense that they would not want something that bypasses the music industry completely on their charts.

But why do I have be prohibited from it just because you have an unintelligible feeling it's bad somehow?

0x70run 1mo ago

[dead]

forshaper 1mo ago

OP specifies that they would prefer opt-in to either side.

happymellon 1mo ago

They didn't say you would be. Just label it, so those that want it can seek it out. Having a music charts that doesn't include AI generated music does not stop AI generated music.

copemaxxxing 1mo ago

Did I say this somewhere?

D-Machine 1mo ago

No one is banning or prohibiting AI generated music from being listened to hear, just they are saying that to be considered on a very specific chart, there need to be limits on the amount of AI used. Very weak overall, especially given the irrelevance of these kinds of charts today.

nunez 1mo ago

Because the only way the economics of the underlying technology remain sustainable is that this stuff is everywhere anywhere all the time, regardless of underlying ethics or how many livelihoods it claims as it spreads. Because the chief business model of this industry is so obviously the "drug dealer" strategy: give 'em their first hits for free and their next few hits for cheap so that they won't even blink while giving the company $200/month to basically rent their own brain back. (lol Imagine JetBrains in 2019 rolled out a super souped-up IDE for $200/month. They'd go bankrupt from the embarrassment alone. Shoot, imagine Hacker News users in 2019 talking about how they pay $200/month to do their own job. SO MANY PEOPLE would cry "MLM!!!!!") Because there's a generation of new people growing up in a world that's progressively training them to forfeit their own capabilities to the industry that will sell their skills back to them, and every AI blog post or song that gets the limelight without protest is tacitly green-lighting this outcome. (This is clearly happening given that Hollywood is trying to make AI actors a thing and some label cut a $3M record deal to an AI musician that's "naturally" charting on Billboard: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/09/27/al-singer-xania-monet-just-charted-on-billboard-signed-3m-deal-is-this-the-future-of-music/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/09/27/al-sing...)

pibaker 1mo ago

The charts in question are compiled by the Australian Recording Industry Association. It makes economical sense that they would not want something that bypasses the music industry completely on their charts.