I genuinely hope they're lying about their monitoring tools and alignment approaches. They repeatedly cite "chain of thought" monitoring, which is better than n

I genuinely hope they're lying about their monitoring tools and alignment approaches. They repeatedly cite "chain of thought" monitoring, which is better than nothing, but at this point thoroughly demonstrated in research to not be actual "thought" or necessarily accurate predictors of actions. I don't know if it's NIH syndrome, not taking alignment seriously, or what.