You keep saying Starlink may be more efficient without providing any actual evidence that it is. Also ignoring the political implications of a country spending

You keep saying Starlink may be more efficient without providing any actual evidence that it is. Also ignoring the political implications of a country spending tax money to buy services from a highly political company from a country whose politics and world influence are in flux right now. Starlink is good because it is easy to deploy quickly. But the entire constellation and service will be dead within 5 years without constant launches of new satellites. Forget efficiency. That sounds like a very poor investment of tax dollars to me. The fiber laid will provide lower latency and higher bandwidth connections for the next 40 years.