3 ms·
Not even remotely close.
by nujabe 1mo ago
Not even remotely close.
- prmoustache 1mo agoFor natural disaster emergency annoucememt it is more reliable than whatsapp.
- gsich 1mo agoCell Broadcast yes, SMS no.
- KellyCriterion 1mo agoIsnt the one just "mass usage" of the other? Like Cell Broadcast just duplicates the SMS on carrier level?
- inexcf 1mo agoNah, Cell Broadcast has a lot less overhead since it does not have to do any routing or delivery confirmation and such. The load does not scale based on recipients which makes it far more reliable during an emergency.
- KellyCriterion 1mo agoSorry, maybe I did "carrier replication" wrong - I used the word in a sense of "it is duplicated at the local cell by the towers", instead of getting "fed with 1mio receivers in region X by the telco servercentral HQ" Im wrong, I guess?
- inigyou 1mo agoCell broadcast, depending on the emergency level set by the sender, also makes your phone vibrate until you read the message, and may also cause it to play a loud siren noise. Which is the sort of thing you want in a real emergency.
- account42 1mo agoWhy, because it can't be monetized by Facebook?
- arijun 1mo agoBecause it doesn't do the job well. It's difficult to send any media, group chats are a pain, international messages often incur fees, it doesn't work on wifi-only, and so on.
- olmo23 1mo agoWhatsapp is used by a lot of "neighbourhood watch" groups, so you'd need an IRC-like channel to replace it.