3 ms·

US sanctioned ICC, Francesca Albanese and a lot of other people who simply tell the truth. The United States may still have power, but they no longer have any

by andretti1977 1mo ago

US sanctioned ICC, Francesca Albanese and a lot of other people who simply tell the truth. The United States may still have power, but they no longer have any credibility and no longer deserve any respect, neither they nor their zionist partners

36799753298 1mo ago
[dead]
deleted 1mo ago
[deleted]
frollogaston 1mo ago
Really best for the US to get rid of the zionism ties. I'm fine with US imperialism, which actually benefits us, not this bs where we spend all our money and diplomatic strength on some other country.
- resoluteteeth 1mo ago
  Supporting allies like this by supplying weapons is is one of the main ways the us projects military strength abroad and the situation with Israel shows how that can actually be counterproductive by escalating hostilities. If you don't want the us to waste money on that you probably actually shouldn't want the us to engage in "imperialism" at all.
  - frollogaston 1mo ago
    The problem with Israel is we do anything they want without getting anything comparable in return. And they control both our parties. It's not like this in Ukraine or the Asian Pacific.
- andretti1977 1mo ago
  Supporting imperialism, any imperialism, simply is wrong. Is this really all that humanity amounts to in 2026? Thinking about imposing its own hegemony on others, the way kings did with their subjects in the Middle Ages? Massacring defenceless peoples like the Palestinians? Behaving like the Nazis? And expecting that no one will respond to such abuses and when they do, calling them terrorists? Are you really okay with imperialism even when you’re the one benefiting from it? Is this all the ‘civilization’ we’ve reached in 2026? Really?
  - frollogaston 1mo ago
    No?
  - hakfoo 1mo ago
    Different arguments for different audiences. Some people respond to moral arguments directly. But even if you're all about extractive imperialism, you can make a case for "starting fires in your own backyard is going to be costly for you, especially in the long term."
jameshilliard 1mo ago
[flagged]
- TheGamerUncle 1mo ago
  >Francesca Albanese does from the looks of it appear to be fairly antisemitic as well, they have made many statements indicating they believe many common antisemitic conspiracy theories at a minimum in addition to statements that appears to be justifying terrorism. lmao no she does not she reported a well substantiated set of claims and provided plenty of evidence. Sadly some Jewish individuals and entities, mainly Zionists tarnish the rest of us jews. But no, telling the truth about bloodthirsty Zionists is not antisemitism. It stopped being "muh cunspirucy thiory" when it became clear how much they loved and worked with Epstein.
  - Obscurity4340 1mo ago
    Or the other Israeli sex offenders who fled the US before their trials and were shielded by their Vaterland
- resoluteteeth 1mo ago
  The ADL has a whole page[1] listing examples of her supposed antisemitism but it basically seems to just be examples of her criticising Israel. I guess the ADL considers that to be the same thing but it is pretty unpersuasive unless you think every criticism of Israel is automatically antisemitism. 1: https://www.adl.org/resources/article/francesca-albanese-her-own-words https://www.adl.org/resources/article/francesca-albanese-her...
  - jameshilliard 1mo ago
    [flagged]
    - claykkari 1mo ago
      > By my reading of just a few of the quotes I'd say she's going well beyond just criticizing Israel. The quotes suggest she believes well known antisemitic conspiracy theories.[0] I'm assuming you're mainly referring to this accusation by the ADL: "Albanese claims that Jews “have learnt [sic] that to survive in this world they need to be superior,” invoking the classic antisemitic conspiracy trope of Jewish power and drive for world domination." Well, except that isn't what she said. The original quote was (still not the full post): "And so they [Germans] have accepted the Jews, but not all of them. Especially those who have learnt that to survive in this world they need to be superior. No longer a fragile minority. No longer diasporic people. No longer the People of the Book. But the Chosen People. ‘Chosen to dominate?’ One may wonder looking at what Israel has become. But Israel does not represent all the Jews." So she was talking about Israeli Jews, not Jews in general. That's the whole point of her post. It's ironic that in fact the ADL is being antisemitic here by equating Judaism with Israel.
cindyllm 1mo ago
[dead]

36799753298 1mo ago

[dead]

deleted 1mo ago

[deleted]

frollogaston 1mo ago

Really best for the US to get rid of the zionism ties. I'm fine with US imperialism, which actually benefits us, not this bs where we spend all our money and diplomatic strength on some other country.

resoluteteeth 1mo ago
Supporting allies like this by supplying weapons is is one of the main ways the us projects military strength abroad and the situation with Israel shows how that can actually be counterproductive by escalating hostilities. If you don't want the us to waste money on that you probably actually shouldn't want the us to engage in "imperialism" at all.
- frollogaston 1mo ago
  The problem with Israel is we do anything they want without getting anything comparable in return. And they control both our parties. It's not like this in Ukraine or the Asian Pacific.
andretti1977 1mo ago
Supporting imperialism, any imperialism, simply is wrong. Is this really all that humanity amounts to in 2026? Thinking about imposing its own hegemony on others, the way kings did with their subjects in the Middle Ages? Massacring defenceless peoples like the Palestinians? Behaving like the Nazis? And expecting that no one will respond to such abuses and when they do, calling them terrorists? Are you really okay with imperialism even when you’re the one benefiting from it? Is this all the ‘civilization’ we’ve reached in 2026? Really?
- frollogaston 1mo ago
  No?
- hakfoo 1mo ago
  Different arguments for different audiences. Some people respond to moral arguments directly. But even if you're all about extractive imperialism, you can make a case for "starting fires in your own backyard is going to be costly for you, especially in the long term."

jameshilliard 1mo ago

[flagged]

TheGamerUncle 1mo ago
>Francesca Albanese does from the looks of it appear to be fairly antisemitic as well, they have made many statements indicating they believe many common antisemitic conspiracy theories at a minimum in addition to statements that appears to be justifying terrorism. lmao no she does not she reported a well substantiated set of claims and provided plenty of evidence. Sadly some Jewish individuals and entities, mainly Zionists tarnish the rest of us jews. But no, telling the truth about bloodthirsty Zionists is not antisemitism. It stopped being "muh cunspirucy thiory" when it became clear how much they loved and worked with Epstein.
- Obscurity4340 1mo ago
  Or the other Israeli sex offenders who fled the US before their trials and were shielded by their Vaterland
resoluteteeth 1mo ago
The ADL has a whole page[1] listing examples of her supposed antisemitism but it basically seems to just be examples of her criticising Israel. I guess the ADL considers that to be the same thing but it is pretty unpersuasive unless you think every criticism of Israel is automatically antisemitism. 1: https://www.adl.org/resources/article/francesca-albanese-her-own-words https://www.adl.org/resources/article/francesca-albanese-her...
- jameshilliard 1mo ago
  [flagged]
  - claykkari 1mo ago
    > By my reading of just a few of the quotes I'd say she's going well beyond just criticizing Israel. The quotes suggest she believes well known antisemitic conspiracy theories.[0] I'm assuming you're mainly referring to this accusation by the ADL: "Albanese claims that Jews “have learnt [sic] that to survive in this world they need to be superior,” invoking the classic antisemitic conspiracy trope of Jewish power and drive for world domination." Well, except that isn't what she said. The original quote was (still not the full post): "And so they [Germans] have accepted the Jews, but not all of them. Especially those who have learnt that to survive in this world they need to be superior. No longer a fragile minority. No longer diasporic people. No longer the People of the Book. But the Chosen People. ‘Chosen to dominate?’ One may wonder looking at what Israel has become. But Israel does not represent all the Jews." So she was talking about Israeli Jews, not Jews in general. That's the whole point of her post. It's ironic that in fact the ADL is being antisemitic here by equating Judaism with Israel.

cindyllm 1mo ago

[dead]