3 ms·
The new signal-slot syntax for Qt5.0 [0] really makes a lot of sense when combined with new c++11 lambdas. But I guess I don't understand what they mean regard
by shawn-butler 14y ago
The new signal-slot syntax for Qt5.0 [0] really makes a lot of sense when combined with new c++11 lambdas. But I guess I don't understand what they mean regarding support for c++11 generally.
Are we talking about significant rewrites and with what compiler? I don't see vendors reaching compliance for at least a year.
[0]: http://qt-project.org/wiki/New_Signal_Slot_Syntax http://qt-project.org/wiki/New_Signal_Slot_Syntax
- marshray 14y agoWill it still require a custom preprocessing step?
- shawn-butler 14y agoThe new syntax would not as type safety is being enforced at compile time. However the old syntax using strings is also available so if it is, then yes used the same preprocessor macro step will apply. Was reading to find answers to some of my own questions and found this link helpful regarding use of c++11 in Qt5 [0]. Use of c++11 features seems limited in the first release which makes sense. [0]: http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html