4 ms·
Wow, you’re right. Xeon vs Xenon I had always assumed with chip names that similar it was an Intel product. How on earth didn’t they get sued?
by Retric 1mo ago
Wow, you’re right.
Xeon vs Xenon
I had always assumed with chip names that similar it was an Intel product. How on earth didn’t they get sued?
- to11mtm 1mo agoI'm guessing that they were safe in that it was more or less a 'codename' for a specific product's CPU that nobody else could buy, versus a product out on the market, left enough clear separation to avoid Trademark complaints. The combined might of IBM and Microsoft's legal teams, even (possibly even moreso?) then, was better than Intel's to be sure.
- rbanffy 1mo agoNot even the DoJ could make Microsoft bend its knee.
- eschaton 1mo agoBecause simple similarity doesn’t usually result in a lawsuit? Especially if one of the words isn’t a public product name and also happens to be an existing word with no existing specific use in the industry.
- Retric 1mo agoFailing to defend trademarks for such similarity named and closely related products has extremely high risks.
- eschaton 1mo ago“Xenon” is a pre-existing word. Intel’s not going to lose protection on “Xeon” for IBM using “Xenon” as an internal codename for their own CPU.
- Retric 1mo agoPre-existing word like “Word” “Excel” “Apple” etc. We know about “Xenon” because they used the internal name outside the company. There’s zero difference between an unofficial and official branding when you’re using it in press releases.