4 ms·
> Xbox 360 used an Intel CPU. No. It was a PowerPC based one called, IIRC, Xenon.
by rbanffy 2mo ago
> Xbox 360 used an Intel CPU.
No. It was a PowerPC based one called, IIRC, Xenon.
- Retric 2mo agoWow, you’re right. Xeon vs Xenon I had always assumed with chip names that similar it was an Intel product. How on earth didn’t they get sued?
- to11mtm 2mo agoI'm guessing that they were safe in that it was more or less a 'codename' for a specific product's CPU that nobody else could buy, versus a product out on the market, left enough clear separation to avoid Trademark complaints. The combined might of IBM and Microsoft's legal teams, even (possibly even moreso?) then, was better than Intel's to be sure.
- rbanffy 2mo agoNot even the DoJ could make Microsoft bend its knee.
- eschaton 2mo agoBecause simple similarity doesn’t usually result in a lawsuit? Especially if one of the words isn’t a public product name and also happens to be an existing word with no existing specific use in the industry.
- Retric 2mo agoFailing to defend trademarks for such similarity named and closely related products has extremely high risks.
- eschaton 2mo ago“Xenon” is a pre-existing word. Intel’s not going to lose protection on “Xeon” for IBM using “Xenon” as an internal codename for their own CPU.
- Retric 2mo agoPre-existing word like “Word” “Excel” “Apple” etc. We know about “Xenon” because they used the internal name outside the company. There’s zero difference between an unofficial and official branding when you’re using it in press releases.
- monocasa 2mo agoAnd in fact it was basically a Cell PPE with a larger vector unit strapped to the side of it.