4 ms·

The important thing to keep in mind is that you're not there to do you boss a favour and he's not giving you a job to do you a favour (that doesn't mean you can

The important thing to keep in mind is that you're not there to do you boss a favour and he's not giving you a job to do you a favour (that doesn't mean you can't, or shouldn't, be nice to each other, and do each other favours - but it's more of a long-term view of the situation). Market pay is whatever you can make someone pay you. If your current employer can't pay you more, either you're not producing enough value, or the value you're producing is being inequitably shared with others in the organisation. Very often in engineer-driven, but non-engineer-led business, this could mean a too big or over-paid sales force. Both is a sign of inefficiency. Chances are if you are on good terms with your boss, you can explain this to them. If they still can't give you a raise, explain that the situation compels you to dip your feet in the water (ideally, you've already done this as the conversation has the potential to sour the relationship with your boss). As always, pull a patio11 and make sure you can articulate the value you're adding in terms of the money you bring in - this always comes easy to sales people (because, well, it is easy - they physically bring the cheques into the building). You've never just refactored component X. You've refactored component X which allowed your team to deliver high-value feature Y to the client, which you believe was brought up as a deciding factor in the contract renegotiations.

lessnonymous 14y ago
DON'T EVER tell your boss you're compelled to dip your feet in the water. 1. If you ask us for a payrise, we have to weigh the cost of the payrise vs the risk you WILL leave to get one somewhere else. We KNOW that if we turn you down, there's a chance you're going to be looking elsewhere. 2. By telling us you're dipping your foot, you've essentially given your notice. You just haven't told us when you're leaving. As of right now, you're not going to get the same level of attention and I'm looking for your replacement. 2b. If you don't tell us you're dipping your foot in the water, but we can't give you a pay rise, you'll get more attention and you'll get anything else we can possibly give you. We might give you a nicer desk, or replace your PC before anyone else's, or take you out for coffee more often.
- ricardobeat 14y ago
  Buying a new desk/computer or increasing amenities is a short-term solution. He will still be looking for the better salary.
  - hfsktr 14y ago
    Depending on the situation that is probably ok with some people. I think a lot of it would come down to quite a few variables. I can't think of any clear examples but I'm sure there are cases to be made.
- michaelochurch 14y ago
  DON'T EVER tell your boss you're compelled to dip your feet in the water. Yes. This is probably the #1 case of high-performer termination: suspected flight risk. Nothing gets you fired faster than indicating that you might be interviewing elsewhere.
  - mhurron 14y ago
    I'm firing you now because you might leave later is a fantastic indication of shitty management. It's a last ditch attempt at lording power over you. Everybody moves on at some time. Management doesn't have to act like children about it.
    - pasbesoin 14y ago
      I think what was being described might be more akin to management seeking to hire a replacement before you leave and they are caught with their pants down. If they're at least somewhat clueful, they know that a high performer's position (by virtue of the high performance, if nothing else) is critical. They may not be happy, but they may do their best to cover the anticipated gap. And some people argue that some management sees interviewing or "looking around" as an incontrovertible sign that, sooner or later, that employee is leaving. Or could leave. And they don't want that risk. P.S. OT, but I'm really tired of LinkedIn and others' heavy-handed Javascript dependencies for blog entries and articles (whichever this one is; I didn't enable scripting) -- essentially for static text.

lessnonymous 14y ago

DON'T EVER tell your boss you're compelled to dip your feet in the water. 1. If you ask us for a payrise, we have to weigh the cost of the payrise vs the risk you WILL leave to get one somewhere else. We KNOW that if we turn you down, there's a chance you're going to be looking elsewhere. 2. By telling us you're dipping your foot, you've essentially given your notice. You just haven't told us when you're leaving. As of right now, you're not going to get the same level of attention and I'm looking for your replacement. 2b. If you don't tell us you're dipping your foot in the water, but we can't give you a pay rise, you'll get more attention and you'll get anything else we can possibly give you. We might give you a nicer desk, or replace your PC before anyone else's, or take you out for coffee more often.

ricardobeat 14y ago
Buying a new desk/computer or increasing amenities is a short-term solution. He will still be looking for the better salary.
- hfsktr 14y ago
  Depending on the situation that is probably ok with some people. I think a lot of it would come down to quite a few variables. I can't think of any clear examples but I'm sure there are cases to be made.
michaelochurch 14y ago
DON'T EVER tell your boss you're compelled to dip your feet in the water. Yes. This is probably the #1 case of high-performer termination: suspected flight risk. Nothing gets you fired faster than indicating that you might be interviewing elsewhere.
- mhurron 14y ago
  I'm firing you now because you might leave later is a fantastic indication of shitty management. It's a last ditch attempt at lording power over you. Everybody moves on at some time. Management doesn't have to act like children about it.
  - pasbesoin 14y ago
    I think what was being described might be more akin to management seeking to hire a replacement before you leave and they are caught with their pants down. If they're at least somewhat clueful, they know that a high performer's position (by virtue of the high performance, if nothing else) is critical. They may not be happy, but they may do their best to cover the anticipated gap. And some people argue that some management sees interviewing or "looking around" as an incontrovertible sign that, sooner or later, that employee is leaving. Or could leave. And they don't want that risk. P.S. OT, but I'm really tired of LinkedIn and others' heavy-handed Javascript dependencies for blog entries and articles (whichever this one is; I didn't enable scripting) -- essentially for static text.