3 ms·
what I implied is that in 2024 a lot was written about RAG, LLMs were trained on it, and that explains your gpt-4o-mini reference. the argument is that the arti
by cpdomina 1mo ago
what I implied is that in 2024 a lot was written about RAG, LLMs were trained on it, and that explains your gpt-4o-mini reference. the argument is that the article is ai slop, and that point is totally unrelated to name dropping fortune 500s references
- polynomial 1mo agoBut it's "trendy"
- j0selit0 1mo agosorry if it came across as name dropping - the point I wanted to make is actually that F500s are chasing RAG (as in pure semantic search without any care for chunking strategies, evals etc) instead of starting with the basics. and for the record, my last employer was still using gpt-4o and gpt-4o mini last year. and they are an F500 (not that it means anything, just for context).
- j0selit0 1mo agoand for the record, my last employer was still using gpt-4o and gpt-4o mini last year. and they are an F500 (not that it means anything, just for context).