3 ms·
On OpenRouter the pricing is: Input $0,075/M - Output $0,25/M - Cache Read $0,015 /M How is the business model of Anthropic/OpenAI will sustain?
by claudeIsDown 1mo ago
On OpenRouter the pricing is:
Input $0,075/M - Output $0,25/M - Cache Read $0,015 /M
How is the business model of Anthropic/OpenAI will sustain?
- dakolli 1mo agoThey're obviously in a pickle, nobody is going to continue to pay $15-50 a mm tokens here soon. There's a reason OpenAI stopped training large models last week, and it's not because of "saftey" or "alignment" they know these gigantic models are not worth the squeeze.
- polski-g 1mo agoThis is a bad model. Worse than Luna in every way; slower, dumber.
- pphysch 1mo agoOAI/Anthropic shareholder? Speed and intelligence are not "every way". Cost is essential. Hence the Pareto boundary illustrated in TFA.
- polski-g 1mo agoIt literally cannot complete tasks that Luna can do easily. It doesn't matter how cheap it is.
- freakynit 1mo agoIt actually can. I have been using it regularly for past 4 days. It is on sol-low level. I deliberately tested it on a moderately complex task. glm-5.3-flash one-shotted it correctly. Luna max couldn't achieve parity even after 3 total attempts. It was creating java bindings for this project: https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb And here is the binding one-shotted by glm-5.3-flash: https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb/pull/5 https://github.com/jeffhajewski/latticedb/pull/5
- vatsachak 1mo agoI think anthropic is behind but Luna on a Jalapeno seems profitable