5 ms·
Inversion: until he open-sources it, I am not interested in his plight in the slightest.
by gamache 14y ago
Inversion: until he open-sources it, I am not interested in his plight in the slightest.
- ryguytilidie 14y agoseems fair. Refuse to use common sense until someone open sources years of work.
- MartinCron 14y agoIf you're not trying to be civil and respectful, please try. If you are trying, please try harder. Thanks.
- delackner 14y agoHe is being perfectly civil. He has succinctly stated a position that you find unpleasant, but that is all. It is not considered "civil" in the non-software world to suggest that someone should give away their possessions before you care about bad things happening to them.
- MartinCron 14y agoIt was the snark and sarcasm that I was taking issue with. I don't have a strong opinion about the position itself. It's a good point cheapened by coarse delivery. We can do better here.
- gamache 14y agoIf FB Purity is there for the good of humanity, great; open it up and let the community keep going. But why should I care if it's a primarily financial venture, and someone built their house on quicksand? Building a business on FB by removing new FB features is not bright.
- ryguytilidie 14y agoBut hes not building a business on FB, hes building a business on browsers to change the way they display FB. This reach alone makes me feel like you're being a bit unreasonable, and the open source demands kind of confirm it.