3 ms·
Take one glance at history, and you'll see that having a sovereign ethnic homeland is crucial to that "freedom to exist". So you're wrong on both counts - they
by like_any_other 2mo ago
Take one glance at history, and you'll see that having a sovereign ethnic homeland is crucial to that "freedom to exist". So you're wrong on both counts - they are also taking a stance for the latter, and the two freedoms can be separated. Distributing FOSS does not require one takes a stance on every ethnic and political conflict on Earth. The GNU manifesto never once talks about the occupation of Tibet. This "cannot be separated" is nothing but a cheap attempt to attach your own cause to some other, more widely accepted cause.
- rbanffy 2mo ago> Distributing FOSS FOSS never was about the right of the distributor. It’s been always about protecting the user. The way to do it is to give the users a set of rights that cannot be revoked.
- nozzlegear 2mo ago> Take one glance at history, and you'll see that having a sovereign ethnic homeland is crucial to that "freedom to exist". United States disproves this harebrained theory.
- like_any_other 2mo agoLike climbing free solo once disproves the need for a safety rope.