2 ms·
It goes for all spheres of life, full stop. I’m not sure if agents struggle with this because they learned it from humans, or if they struggle with it because i
by taneq 1mo ago
It goes for all spheres of life, full stop. I’m not sure if agents struggle with this because they learned it from humans, or if they struggle with it because it’s a universally challenging problem, but it’s something we share with them.
- ShinyLeftPad 1mo agoThe comment highlighted how LLMs exacerbate the issue by entrenching the preexisting issues.
- Terretta 1mo agoIndeed, and reply to comment seemed a "yes and" -- As with humans. It's curious how much of these could apply to either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstructive_memory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstructive_memory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_effect And many mechanisms exacerbate issues by entrenching preexisting issues.
- ShinyLeftPad 1mo agoI don't understand. The comment said if humans want to change the route, this tech makes it more difficult. Human inertia is X, inertia with this tech is X ^ Y. The Y is the issue being discussed.
- Schlagbohrer 1mo ago"Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever wrought"
- Terr_ 1mo agoYou full-stopped too soon: It may happen everywhere, but it doesn't happen the same way everywhere or for the same reasons. LLMs will create different kinds of corruption than humans, because the underlying mechanisms are different. Our ability to manage type of corruption will depend on how whether they can be predicted by math or intuition.
- taneq 1mo agoYou’re kind of begging the question that I asked after the full stop. I was wondering how much the underlying mechanism matters if it’s modelling the same environment to a similar level of effectiveness.