> I had assumed that JPEG XL was for JPEGs that are Xtra Large, since that's what XL means on clothing and pretty much everywhere else. Yup the name isn't the

> I had assumed that JPEG XL was for JPEGs that are Xtra Large, since that's what XL means on clothing and pretty much everywhere else. Yup the name isn't the best pick indeed. What most people don't know is that JPEG XL can be used to crush JPEG files by 15% to 25% without any single quality loss. And the resulting .jxl file can be used to then reproduce the original .jpg file bit-for-bit. People can test this at the CLI for themselves.