> A lot of those 46, actually. 46. I am pretty certain that the explanation lies completely elsewhere... (overuse of overstatements, for the sake of manipulat

> A lot of those 46, actually. 46. I am pretty certain that the explanation lies completely elsewhere... (overuse of overstatements, for the sake of manipulation, perhaps? something that makes their saying unreliable this way - e.g. they forget to mention the other end of the range, or perhaps the mean, completely .... except when it is good for them, e.g. prices ... that's borderline to lying this way...)