2 ms·
Are we entering a world where if I took a picture with a film camera and scanned it, it would be rejected as not real? This is ridiculous.
by qurren 1mo ago
Are we entering a world where if I took a picture with a film camera and scanned it, it would be rejected as not real?
This is ridiculous.
- CapitalistCartr 1mo agoIt's not a matter of "rejected as not real", it's "There's no way to know if this is real or not".
- account42 1mo agoWhen 99% of people are posting pics from their big tech approved smartphones with the "200% real no way to fake this" badge it doesn't matter that absence of the badge technically doesn't mean fake, that's what it will be interpreted as.
- lelandfe 1mo agoThe defendant submitted a remarkably high quality video of you saying you generated it with Nano Banana.
- ted_dunning 1mo agoAnd their video was C2PA signed.
- spaqin 1mo agoYou can even do it wholly in an analogue process, do a darkroom print, and it could be seen as fake as well - darkroom techniques are quite flexible as well. And a negative itself? That could be a copy of a prepared printed slide.