The traditional argument for a copyright of "Limited Terms", in the constitution, is that it makes it possible for artists to make a living, terms. Clearly 30 y

The traditional argument for a copyright of "Limited Terms", in the constitution, is that it makes it possible for artists to make a living, terms. Clearly 30 years is adequate for that - only a very small number of works even get consumed after that time. However, you're arguing that an artist has a "natural right" to their work, Forever. And that if it ever enters public domain and is used, it's users are thieves. (it's only possible to "take it" if copyright is considered a natural right)