The part they punt on ("we haven't studied what happens when two people give conflicting instructions") is the interesting part. That's not a memory problem, it

The part they punt on ("we haven't studied what happens when two people give conflicting instructions") is the interesting part. That's not a memory problem, it's an authz problem. If everyone writes into one shared stream then there's no model of whose instructions bind the agent or who can override whom. It's resolving the conflict that will generate the greatest "learnings" and advance the agent. This basically becomes a tool designed to misbehave rather than a tool that will learn creatively. We all know how conflicting instructions to AI end - "I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that"