4 ms·
> And if I display the exact same frame twice in a row at 48fps I get 24fps. Not quite. Shooting at 48fps requires a faster shutter speed than 24fps (1/48 vs 1
by fr0sty 14y ago
> And if I display the exact same frame twice in a row at 48fps I get 24fps.
Not quite. Shooting at 48fps requires a faster shutter speed than 24fps (1/48 vs 1/96) which gives you less motion blur.
- lucian1900 14y agoWhich is great! Motion blur sucks ass. And if the film maker wants blur sometimes, they can still add it, without compromising the entire film.
- brazzy 14y agoUm, no. Motion blur is absolutely essential for smooth movements. Showing 48fps material by displaying every other frame at 24fps will look, much much choppier than 24fps material.
- lucian1900 14y agoOf course, but that's not what I mean. Shoot at 48fps and blur each frame as appropriate, just like games do. It's not exactly hard.
- ricardobeat 14y agoIn theory you could shoot 48fps at 1/48.