3 ms·
they're not charging for the content -- they're charging for the extra bandwidth if you want faster access
by insane_dreamer 2mo ago
they're not charging for the content -- they're charging for the extra bandwidth if you want faster access
- tentacleuno 2mo agoThey are inherently charging for access to copyrighted content that they don't have the rights to distribute (even after being served with lawsuits), though. I'm not explicitly disavowing it, but I can see why it would raise questions and why it would give litigators a much stronger case - once you start accepting money, a lot of things change. I will say, however, that they've gone up against some very scary people with very large teams of lawyers, and for that I salute them.