3 ms·
With the growth in solar, it is easy to think that we can solve it, we just do more renewables, but the decline of fossil fuels is negligible: https://www.linke
by thelastgallon 2mo ago
With the growth in solar, it is easy to think that we can solve it, we just do more renewables, but the decline of fossil fuels is negligible: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7438918221094772736/ https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7438918221...
Globally, fossil fuels supply 81.1% today (2023). Only marginally down from 81.4% in 2000. Fossil fuels are not on track to end by 2050. But rather in 4-10 centuries.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2mo agoSolar + wind were 99% of new generation capacity last year. Fossil fuel usage dropped for one of the first times ever. Renewables generated more than coal. Solar installation is huge and the increase continues to accelerate. Every year has seen a record amount of installed solar. Solar started at zero two decades ago and is already curbing other sources.
- thelastgallon 2mo agoThat 99% may be just Australia and not the entire world? There seems to be a ton of new coal and gas plants still coming online, 95% of them in China and India. 100 GW of new coal plants and 100 GW of gas. There are probably ~1000 gas plants in the pipeline just in US for data centers. And a ton more onsite gas turbines, like Musks Colossus DC, 1GW of compute powered by gas turbines. From: https://www.carbonbrief.org/new-coal-plants-hit-10-year-global-high-in-2025-but-power-output-still-fell https://www.carbonbrief.org/new-coal-plants-hit-10-year-glob... > In 2025, coal-capacity growth hit a 10-year high, with 97 gigawatts (GW) of new power > The number of new coal-fired power plants built around the world hit a “10-year high” in 2025 > It adds that 95% of the new coal plants were built in India and China. > 70% of the coal-fired units scheduled to retire globally in 2025 did not do so
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2mo agoEven the title and first line of that article supports my point, “New coal plants hit ‘10-year’ global high in 2025 – but power output still fell”. Coal capacity is increasing, but it is not being used. Mostly China is constructing new plants but leaving them idle. Check the Ember 2026 report for all the global details: ..In another global milestone, renewables overtook coal power in 2025. Solar, wind, hydropower and other renewable sources together contributed more than a third of global electricity generation for the first time in the modern power system. Conversely, the share of coal power fell below a third for the first time in history. .. Driven by record solar growth, low-carbon power generation increased by 887 TWh in 2025, outpacing electricity demand growth of 849 TWh. Solar power alone met 75% of the net increase in electricity demand. Together with wind, the two sources met almost all (99%) demand growth. For the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, and only the fifth time this century, fossil generation did not rise, recording a small fall of 38 TWh (-0.2%). Also, a whole 200GW new coal+gas capacity in the pipeline! OMG! In 2025, the world installed 647GW of solar capacity, generating 2778 TWh. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-review-2026/ https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-...
- apothegm 2mo agoThe trouble is that we’re adding renewables to add capacity, not as a way to bring significant amounts of fossil fuel capacity offline.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2mo agoI assure you, it is not performative. While solar is the fastest growing energy source in human history, it still takes time to replace a century of existing infrastructure. Despite rising electricity demand, so much solar has already been installed that fossil fuel generation decreased last year. Renewables now generate more total energy than coal. This will only continue as more solar + batteries come online. Thanks to Iran, renewable projects are getting fast tracked globally to reduce the dependence on foreign energy.
- toasty228 2mo ago> With the growth in solar, it is easy to think that we can solve it, 90% of things you can buy/use would not exist without fossil fuels, including food, medicine, clothes, roads, tires, electronics, solar panels, windmills, etc.
- deadbunny 2mo agoSounds super valuable, we should probably stop setting a finite resource on fire.
- breakyerself 2mo agoDo not conflate fossil fuels with all petroleum products. With concern to global warming we are primarily concerned with things you light on fire to generate electricity. There's no reason to mention things that aren't being lit of fire.
- Voultapher 2mo agoGuys, stop trying to solve climate change. You can't solve "wanting the wrong thing".
- breakyerself 2mo agoNot long ago fossil fuel use was growing exponentially. The fact that its flatlined is a major turn in the course of history. There's no reason it can't begin to decline exponentially at any time.