4 ms·
Ok, ok, congrats on a very clever response, but you're missing the point. The key thing (and why I prefer the related tool, linked above) is whether or not the
by josscrowcroft 14y ago
Ok, ok, congrats on a very clever response, but you're missing the point. The key thing (and why I prefer the related tool, linked above) is whether or not the result looks good.
Is the article pseudo-intellectual and kind of wanky? Of course it is. It's the internet.
Does the resulting typography look good?
- Silhouette 14y agoIs the article pseudo-intellectual and kind of wanky? Of course it is. It's the internet. And yet there are many good articles on typography you could have linked to instead: try the typography section in A List Apart or even some of the more recent stuff on Smashing Magazine for basic ideas in small doses, or read the likes of Matthew Butterick for a lot of thoughtful and more detailed comments. Does the resulting typography look good? No, it often won't. That's why I challenged your link.