3 ms·
> Matrix is in the same place wrt feature mismatches. not it isn't - still today there's no choice between incompatible room types or incompatible encryption a
by tcfhgj 2mo ago
> Matrix is in the same place wrt feature mismatches.
not it isn't - still today there's no choice between incompatible room types or incompatible encryption algorithms and whatever else.
- akho 2mo agoCalls are implemented differently across clients, threads only sometimes work. And, apparently from your comment, there's only ever going to be one encryption algorithm, because cryptography is a solved problem now?..
- tcfhgj 2mo agoDon't Element Continuwuity, Synapse, Sable, FluffyChat and more all implement Matrix RTC, because this is most likely the future of video calls in Matrix (while not even officially part of the spec at this point)? > And, apparently from your comment, there's only ever going to be one encryption algorithm, because cryptography is a solved problem now?.. That's not from my comment. If there will be another one it likely will be integrated into THE specification such that it will NOT divide the ecosystem into "I prefer MEGOLM" and "I prefer to implement new thing".
- selfhoster1312 2mo agoI don't have a horse in this race, but "incompatible room types" is precisely an issue i encountered on a selfhosted server. Agreed, that was for S2S federation and not C2S, but that was an issue.