3 ms·
I'm more inclined to believe the person who backed up their argument with a citation, especially after looking at the document they linked which expressly contr
by anigbrowl 2mo ago
I'm more inclined to believe the person who backed up their argument with a citation, especially after looking at the document they linked which expressly contradicts you.
- kakoni 2mo agoSorry, messed up the terms here. You became producer. From the earlier faq that parent posted; > The following provide some typical examples of who the producer of transport packaging is: - If Company A fills the cardboard boxes and sells them to an end user in another Member State, then Company A would typically be the producer in that other Member State.
- IsTom 2mo agoIn the following > If Company A manufactures cardboard boxes under the name or trademark of Company B, then Company B will typically become the manufacturer and producer of the boxes in that Member State. However, if Company B is a micro-enterprise, then Company A is manufacturer and the producer in the Member State. That has the same "typically", so I'd assume it has the same micro-enterprise exemption. Otherwise only branded boxes would be exempt and that'd be pretty weird.