3 ms·

This doesn’t seem right. 1 in 6.2 billion for Firefox on an iphone, not including ip/network uniqueness? Seems more plausible that anti-fingerprinting is throw

This doesn’t seem right. 1 in 6.2 billion for Firefox on an iphone, not including ip/network uniqueness? Seems more plausible that anti-fingerprinting is throwing it off?

randomblock1 2mo ago
Yeah seems like it doesn't account for anti-fingerprinting at all.
mattkrause 2mo ago
Some of the data seems straight-up wrong. I know this computer has more RAM than reported and it's definitely not on a 4G network either.
- daveoc64 2mo ago
  The APIs it's relying on to show you that information do implement some anti-fingerprinting mechanisms - things like available memory will be put into rough buckets rather than returning the exact amount you have.
  - DavidD 2mo ago
    [dead]
- DeluluDon 2mo ago
  It got facebook pixel wrong. I see zero DNS requests to facebook.com on NextDNS
  - DavidD 2mo ago
    That panel reconstructs what a pixel would send from your own browser values, locally, and never makes the request. NextDNS seeing nothing is the tool working exactly as designed.
    - ramon156 2mo ago
      what?
      - danudey 2mo ago
        They're saying that the site simulates what would be sent to Facebook without actually sending the request to Facebook. (I'm not sure if that's true, but I hope so)
dullcrisp 2mo ago
Also 1 in 6.2 billion for Safari on an iPhone. Also the explanation on the bottom is very small and AI generated.
nijave 2mo ago
Also skeptical. Pixel 7 on Android 15 with patched Chrome incognito on T-Mobile CGNAT showing 1 in 11 billion. The population on Earth is ~8.3 billion. I find it hard to believe it's that unique. Nothing in the data looked particularly interesting. Maybe slightly plausible if you take into account the currently assigned IPv6 although that's largely time bound.