3 ms·
> Just like they want it to be illegal to run local ML inference. Citation?
by vaylian 2mo ago
> Just like they want it to be illegal to run local ML inference.
Citation?
- peri-cl 2mo agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49076057 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49076057 ("Our position on open-weights models (anthropic.com)", 1812 comments)
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- vaylian 2mo agoI see. The following two statements (headlines) stand out: * We should not sell powerful chips or chipmaking equipment to China * We should crack down on industrial-scale distillation operations That's not quite a ban of local ML inference, but it basically says that he doesn't want companies in China to create their own state of the art models.
- peri-cl 2mo agoNo; it's the other headline, mandatory US government certification, that would ban Americans from running their own Chinese large models.
- bookofjoe 2mo agoOver the past decade I've noticed on HN the following order of frequency in choice of words, most common to least: 1. Citation 2. Source 3. Reference Long ago in a career based on original research, I/we ONLY used "reference."
- tygon 2mo agoWhile it is definitely over a decade at this point (over two in fact), some of this likely comes from the term [citation needed], that originated on Wikipedia, as a cynical backhanded response to unsourced claims. It has become a catch-all. Language and how it evolves is a pretty interesting subject.
- bookofjoe 2mo agoYou're right. Has to be of Wikipedia use origin. Thanks!
- vaylian 2mo agoI could have written more words, but they would have not conferred more meaning.