3 ms·
I'd like to know more about the GUID part and how easy is it so deanonymize yeah. But if it's only on ai generation and not on all images it seems easy enough
by nemomarx 2mo ago
I'd like to know more about the GUID part and how easy is it so deanonymize yeah.
But if it's only on ai generation and not on all images it seems easy enough to work around that part? Still better than printers doing it no matter what you're printing.
- jijji 2mo agoThe article says that once converted to BMP all the metadata gets removed....so on linux: convert file.jpg file.bmp; convert file.bmp file.jpg
- jkaplowitz 2mo agoIt says that about the C2PA content credentials metadata, but not about the modified image pixels.
- kbelder 2mo agoConversion from jpg to bmp to jpg is a lossy process, so it may obscure the watermarked pixels.
- setopt 2mo agoSounds better to do postprocess filtering explicitly? For example, adding random noise with amplitude 1/255 (which should be as invisible as the watermark), followed by a smart blur that blurs more in directions where the colors are more similar (making the blur less obvious to humans). But this is all moot really, if MS Paint is watermarking shit, it’s better to just use something else. Nothing from Microsoft is trustworthy.
- StingyJelly 2mo agoor maybe add 3 lsb noise, then let local diffusion model denoise the image. (is there something like convolutional diffusion denoiser?)
- Ohentis 2mo agoIf it works anything like synthid, it is more resilient than that.