4 ms·

Not for subscribers though

by wahnfrieden 2mo ago

ok123456 2mo ago
Subscribers already get random rolling resets.
- TuxSH 2mo ago
  Which is not that great for people using less than 50% every week, because the next reset date moves forward too. In essence, it is redistributing compute from people who haven't used their quota much to those who have. Though I think they gave a banked reset this time.
  - throw8494949839 2mo ago
    Pretty much. I had 24 hours left with 80% remaining credit (planned big session tomorrow). There was reset one hour ago, that effectively halved my tokens for next 8 days!
- sejje 2mo ago
  Do they take them back? Codex a few weeks ago said I had 2 resets. I didn't use any, and now it doesn't say that.
  - ModernMech 2mo ago
    They do in fact expire.
skybrian 2mo ago
How do you know? I see a “weekly usage limit” bar in my ChatGPT settings, but I’m pretty fuzzy about what makes it go down. If I stick with Luna, I can make it through the week.
- Kye 2mo ago
  ChatGPT Work and Codex use that. Normal chat has a different, unspecified limit.
  - skybrian 2mo ago
    Yep. I'm actually using ChatGPT integration via exe.dev to write code. It uses my subscription through an API and runs down the usage limit in a similar way. The part I don't understand is how usage is "charged" against this limit.
calumcl 2mo ago
Subscribers were already getting subsidised compute and value compared to the 20-200$ fee, peak cakeism to want more considering the alternative would likely be consumption based pricing for individuals so you "benefit" from OpenAI giving up some of their markup (and heavy users end up SOL).
- wahnfrieden 2mo ago
  Looks like you’ve confused clarification for begging
  - calumcl 2mo ago
    There was context for neither in your original post and I personally saw a lot of similar takes like the above online - apologies for the misunderstanding. I personally thought it was pretty clear considering the parent link is a link to the API pricing and their public communication on their twitter/blogs were "Subscription usage remains unchanged".
    - wahnfrieden 2mo ago
      Typically subscription usage follows API pricing, but that disclaimer was absent from this HN link. It's only clear if you've seen those other communications

Not for subscribers though

ok123456 2mo ago

Subscribers already get random rolling resets.

TuxSH 2mo ago
Which is not that great for people using less than 50% every week, because the next reset date moves forward too. In essence, it is redistributing compute from people who haven't used their quota much to those who have. Though I think they gave a banked reset this time.
- throw8494949839 2mo ago
  Pretty much. I had 24 hours left with 80% remaining credit (planned big session tomorrow). There was reset one hour ago, that effectively halved my tokens for next 8 days!
sejje 2mo ago
Do they take them back? Codex a few weeks ago said I had 2 resets. I didn't use any, and now it doesn't say that.
- ModernMech 2mo ago
  They do in fact expire.

skybrian 2mo ago

How do you know? I see a “weekly usage limit” bar in my ChatGPT settings, but I’m pretty fuzzy about what makes it go down. If I stick with Luna, I can make it through the week.

Kye 2mo ago
ChatGPT Work and Codex use that. Normal chat has a different, unspecified limit.
- skybrian 2mo ago
  Yep. I'm actually using ChatGPT integration via exe.dev to write code. It uses my subscription through an API and runs down the usage limit in a similar way. The part I don't understand is how usage is "charged" against this limit.

calumcl 2mo ago

Subscribers were already getting subsidised compute and value compared to the 20-200$ fee, peak cakeism to want more considering the alternative would likely be consumption based pricing for individuals so you "benefit" from OpenAI giving up some of their markup (and heavy users end up SOL).

wahnfrieden 2mo ago
Looks like you’ve confused clarification for begging
- calumcl 2mo ago
  There was context for neither in your original post and I personally saw a lot of similar takes like the above online - apologies for the misunderstanding. I personally thought it was pretty clear considering the parent link is a link to the API pricing and their public communication on their twitter/blogs were "Subscription usage remains unchanged".
  - wahnfrieden 2mo ago
    Typically subscription usage follows API pricing, but that disclaimer was absent from this HN link. It's only clear if you've seen those other communications