You just attempted to define consciousness here with a series of arbitrary features. Don’t not see how you’re making it up? The sounding and spelling of the wo

You just attempted to define consciousness here with a series of arbitrary features. Don’t not see how you’re making it up? The sounding and spelling of the word itself is made up. Then your attribution of these arbitrary features like an actively revised internal model to the definition is also made up. You are debating about a language problem. Vocabulary. Vocabulary is not a profound or interesting problem. That is what the whole “what is consciousness” issue revolves around.