3 ms·
Why do you think he's immoral? If you equate "enabled people to share more of their lives more broadly" with "damaged people's privacy" then I agree, but I'm n
by jfoster 14y ago
Why do you think he's immoral?
If you equate "enabled people to share more of their lives more broadly" with "damaged people's privacy" then I agree, but I'm not sure even a majority would agree with a sentiment of that necessarily being a bad thing. People share what they feel comfortable with, don't they?
- meaty 14y agoIt's not about what but to whom. To whom is hard to control and is made harder on purpose as after all, their entire model is based on encouraging sharing legitimately or otherwise. Don't underestimate the power of the majority to make a crap decision. That's why we have privacy and data protection laws in the EU: to protect people from predatory information gathering and sharing.